Law
De Jure: Getting Legislation into AI
mlj.solutions
mlj.solutions AI jako digitální právník? ⚖️🤖 Co když umělá inteligence dokáže sama číst zákony, vyhodnocovat pravidla a kontrolovat jejich správnost? Přesně tím se zabývá systém De Jure - technologie, která automatizuje práci s právními předpisy a posouvá compliance na novou úroveň. ➡️ méně manuální práce ➡️ rychlejší zpracování regulací ➡️ vyšší přesnost díky self-check mechanismům Budoucnost firem nebude jen o tom, kdo má data. Ale kdo jim dokáže správně porozumět. Jaký máte názor vy - důvěřovali byste AI při auditu právních předpisů? 👀
View on InstagramWhat the study is about
- Getting legislation into a form that AI can understand remains a manual and costly process.
- De Jure is a fully automated pipeline from Vanguard that handles this without human annotations, domain-specific prompts, or training data.
94%
average extraction quality score
De Jure achieved an overall average score above 4.70 out of 5.00 across three regulatory domains, three legal systems, and four different AI models — with zero customization.
73.8%
of cases where De Jure outperformed the competition
For compliance questions based on HIPAA regulations, answers grounded in De Jure rules were preferred in 73.8% of cases with standard retrieval, and in 84% with broader retrieval.
0
human annotations required for deployment
The pipeline operates without labeled data, domain-specific prompts, or expert configuration — and still delivers results comparable to approaches that rely on manual effort.
Key takeaways
- Legal text is extremely challenging for AI — conditions, exceptions, and hierarchical dependencies mean that a first extraction pass is almost never sufficient.
- Iterative refinement is essential — a single attempt is not enough; quality only improves after a second and third pass.
- Open-source models are closing the gap — the difference between the best open-source model and GPT-4o-mini was less than 0.04 points.
- Input quality determines output quality — poor document segmentation cannot be corrected by downstream processing.
- Hallucinations can be eliminated — schema-constrained extraction achieved a Non-Hallucination score of 5.00 across all models and all phases.
Our take
Compliance in regulated industries is not about reading the law. It’s about having a system that knows what the law says — and can verify it. These are exactly the kinds of architectures we design.
Michal Dobrovolný
Zdroj
Guliani, K., Gill, D., Landsman, D., Eshraghi, N., Kumar, K., & Gondara, L. (2026). De Jure: Iterative LLM Self-Refinement for Structured Extraction of Regulatory Rules. arXiv:2604.02276. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02276
Keep reading
Don't miss these posts
Want to implement AI in your company?
We'll go through your needs together and propose an approach that delivers measurable results.
Write to us
